[flagged]
So "Fox News" has a massive accuracy problem. Or are they actually only "Fox Commentaries"?
Or declared a US company a supply chain risk after trying to weasel out of a contract.
Or, you know, incited a terrorist attack on the US Capitol...
So why do they get all the breaks? False advertising and fraud aren't covered by the First Amendment.
Like they were preparing for someone to actually do it, because it already happened with the last guy, right?
I do agree with you though, if reporting is wrong then that's the problem. In those cases, and there are plenty, the concern raised should be inaccuracy rather than optics though.