> [...] the fact that this isn't the case really says it all about how it's not the "user agent" anymore. [...] yes it breaks a lot of sites, but then you should ask yourself if the content was really worth reading in the first place!

Users want websites to work. The agent excludes a feature that, you admit, break most websites.

Yet you find it puzzling and anti-user behavior? Can you elaborate?

Would you be okay if it was built-in but disabled by default and hidden behind a setting or a flag?