Texas at least disagrees with you - https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU01/20250122/117827/HHRG...
Do you have statistics to back your assertions that disagree with this data?
Do you have statistics to back your assertions that disagree with this data?
Germany: https://www.bka.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Publikationen/Pol...
Total N = ~2.2M Germans = ~1.2M (~58%) Non-Germans = ~900k (~42%)
Population: Germans ~71M (~85%), foreign ~12M (~15%)
Per-capita, non-Germans show up ~2.8x more.
Approximate rates:
Germans: ~1,786 per 100k (baseline) All Non-Germans: ~7,365 per 100k (~4.1× German rate) Syria: ~12,900 per 100k (~7.2×) Afghanistan: ~12,300 per 100k (~6.9×) Romania: ~8,450 per 100k (~4.7×) Turkey: ~6,660 per 100k (~3.7×) Poland: ~6,640 per 100k (~3.7×) Ukraine: ~5,130 per 100k (~2.9×)
---
Some other countries (Switzerland, Denmark) also publish per-nationality data and it doesn't look any better. The other comment shows data from Norway/Finland/Sweden which is more of the same.
The US is a different topic (but strong arguments with clear data can be made as well), so I'll refrain from engaging it here to avoid further derailing the thread.
I was going to explain some of the others when I realized that in the context of this thread — namely comparing Europe to China in terms of ethnic diversity — these misleading statistics smell like a call to return to a ‘monocultural’ Europe. My grandparents have had pretty bad experiences with Germany’s last attempt at that; I therefore want to stress how dangerous it can be to present statistics like these as ‘neutral’.