> Good specs should be grounded (complete and not ambiguous), they don't need to be formal
IMHO, this is a mistake. I guess we play with it because there’s isn’t anything better nowadays. Writing and maintaining “specs” in plain english is painful.
IMHO, this is a mistake. I guess we play with it because there’s isn’t anything better nowadays. Writing and maintaining “specs” in plain english is painful.
The subject of this entire post is development with agents. Writing specs in English is how you do that. If you don't like it, then this is probably not the right article for you to be commenting on.