[flagged]
AI could provided assistance with building both cars and software, but you still need a decent level of knowledge in either field to get a good result.
Not every person can drive a car.
> but they can't build a car.
Not every person is unable to build a car.
Eg: my father, born 1935, still alive, has built double axle trailers, cars and vehicles that work, medical caravans for St Johns Ambulance, ...
His education was six years of primary school and these were all "side projects" for himself or for his community.
> you still need a decent level of knowledge in either field
and the barrier to picking up sufficient knowledge to safely create software, cars, even ground effect flying boats isn't that high for normal human beings .. although it does require a certain can do attitude.
They are driving (lol) towards the sale of a computer with a model on chip without a programmer salary and benefits adding to cost and resource use (all the tools of the trade need to be stored and copied around).
This is capitalism, not honorific obligationism! Saving your job is no one else's burden! Disrupt! (YC crowd 15 years ago). Oh how the turn tables.
Move the context of the code to the presentation layer and eliminate state by keeping the hardware focused on computing geometric transforms. Biggidy bam label the data on the display and save both geometry and labels
There's no reason for biz logic context to exist in code.
Just stokes addiction to a false sense of empowerment and social contribution
Downvote away to hide from ideas and opinions you don't like.
Conservative people are the only people so dysregulated by ideas they don't understand or that do not validate prior experience and embedded biases they just try to hide them from view. Not the kind of people whose judgment I concern myself with in any meaningful way
I agree. We've had large and thriving online forums for at least a decade before upvote systems became ubiquitous and things were just fine.
yeah keep chatting with the sycophantic psychosis-inducing LLM chatbot, I think you'll have a better time.
LLMs are mass theft of intellectual property. I didn't need them to "drive" this computer for the last ten years.
they are different systems created for completely different reasons. the idea of calling them all "property" came from lobbyists who wanted to make people think they are natural rights that should be expanded and protected at all costs, instead of tools made for a specific purpose.
thats how we get todays system where publishing anything even without a copyright notice gives you life plus 70 years of total exclusivity, but also if you signed a bad contract with your employer they will act like all your work belongs to them even if you did it on your own time and threaten you with lawsuits if you try and fight. its bad at protecting artists (just look at the music industry) and even worse at protecting the public.
what llm vendors (not the models themselves) are doing is not really theft because you cant steal something if the original owner has it the whole time. the bad thing they actually do is train llms on everyones work and then claim copyright over the result. that is the real injustice. and its why i think open source === ethical when it comes to ai. if you take you have to give back.
the only true permanent solution is a full rebalance. all "ip" rights should be for commercial use only and last 25 years or less. yes that means piracy is legal as long as you dont make money off it. unpaid royalties are a problem for real people but pirates only hurt corporations. i know what side im on.
"intellectual property does not exist" -> goes on to define various legal instruments for protecting intellectual property.
"you can't steal something if the original owner has it the whole time" Is this fifth grade? So if I go over to your house and trash it, it doesn't matter the house was under your possession the whole time.
No the rebalance is to sue these companies into the dirt.