I wonder how much of the sloppy feeling is created by the knowledge that its AI generated.
What do they think of the constant repetition of slow panning shows where barely anything is happening, or a guy spinning on the floor but his head morphs into his feet and his feet morph into his head, or a person kissing a mirror that isn't quite mirroring the person and it slowly becomes a person kissing what appears to be their identical twin standing on the other side a floating empty mirror frame?
I wonder what would happen in a study where some art is critiqued by one group that is informed that the art was created by AI and another group that is uninformed.