>It appears that LLMs have already incorporated APOSD EDIT: The text of the book _A Philosophy of Software Design_ ENDEDIT (which would seem to be illegal, since it is copyrighted). For example, I have asked ChatGPT questions about APOSD and it seems to be able to answer.
https://groups.google.com/g/software-design-book/c/_wl1DciZZ...
- what's APOSD
- "it's illegal since it's copyrighted" makes no sense to me
- The settlement should be exactly to cover their licenses for training
Please ask John Ousterhout what his cut of this settlement will be, and whether or no he agreed to it and finds it acceptable.
If he's not getting a cut of this settlement then that's between him and his publisher.
That's the innate disparity and unfairness here --- time was when one made a design which was physically instantiated and replicated, the copies would wear out and one would then earn money again on replacement copies --- this is just another example of the commons and other resources being grabbed by profiteers who use them to make money as opposed for public benefit.