Yeah, it appears that if your prior is that AI can't be good, no evidence can convince you that actually current models are extremely capable.
you're doing the exact same thing by making the inverse claim without any information, at least the original comment claims some change for someone to investigate... all you're doing is disagreeing as an opportunity to be snarky
Pseudo-intellectual drivel.
The OP is calling Karpathy out for producing slop, all because he loves playing with AI. Karpathy has done more for the industry than 10 of the OPs combined. Get a life.