I think the current weakest part is the explanation of the science behind it, but I'm curious if there was anything specific that jumped out at you.
"A warm filter is not a tinted overlay." That's lovely (I suppose), but only an AI would start a section by telling me what something is not, rather than what it is. It's also not really a calamari salad, but it didn't see fit to mention that. This time.
Strongest AI indicator: Words that may carry meaning, if you don't think so hard, but don't work towards any meaningful narrative (because there is none) -- they carry the LLMs need to generate text, not the reader's need to gain progressive understanding. All of this writing without a mind model of the reader shares the same flaws.