Now remind me again, who trained a coding-assistant without consent on those "freeloaders" code and sold it for profit?
Of course some people take it too far. Of course there are reasons that the outages are occurring. But Microsoft wants GitHub to be a core, reliable pillar of the software world. Nobody's making them do that, they do it because it's good for them.
Did I iject copilot into every part of github? In fact not only did I not insert it, I have never even used it.
Did I move their infrastructure to Azure?
Did I sell them to MS?
Did I set all the directives and priorities that MS has set on them like telling everyone they must use openai for everything, and then telling them they must stop doing that and user their own ai instead?
The outage is not due to a natural disaster that no one could anticipate and no one had any input on creating the conditions. They keep the free tier because THEY want what THEY get from the free tier. They could easily have a $1 tier and various totally sensible throttle limits on various services and apis that would have avoided all this, but that would not get them the 100% user coverage that they want. So THEY choose to provide free, swiss cheese service.
It's not some unreasobable burden they labor under that anyone else should be understanding and forgiving about.
It's curious why anyone outside of GH or MS leadership would even care to try to make such a claim.
It sounds a little bit unfair to me.
Do you have a source for that factoid? (I suspect the vast majority of Github resource usage is paid. And we are upset.)
We're still staying on Github at work, but have had backup self hosted git repos as a break glass option when Github is completely broken and leveraged this several times now.
People take the weirdest rhetorical hostages.
It's a service that is owned and operated by Microsoft Corporation, and we're the product of it.