Maybe I should have added this part. As a non-native English speaker, using AI to write RFCs, ADRs, and internal documentation, my own writing style shifted so much to the direction that my writing seems like AI.
So, if you "write like AI" like you claim in a later comment, you are so good at it to accidently hit Pangram's extremely low false positive rate.
It is trivial to check this stuff. Just be honest.
If people do not like that particular style of writing and you understand it clearly, why would you double down on it? Especially if your goal is to share your writing with the intention of them reading it?
Furthermore, why not just blog in your native langauge if that is comfortable for you?
Regardless, my feedback to you would be to disclose AI writing if you do use it (in the blog itself, not as a reply when called out for it) or if you genuinely write like that, aspire to be better than AI generated content if you care about what you are reaching out with in the first place imo.
I guess you don't like it, so skip it then? Don't constantly relitigate.
In a few years it would be interesting to see a research about how LLMs influenced the choice of words in the general population.
But fwiw, your post didn’t trigger my LLM detector, and you’re writing thoughtfully about things that many of us are thinking about. Kudos.