>The intent is good, but it seems they're still in the "fake it until you make it" stage

Please notice the internal contradictions here.

To be honest perplexity does nothing to make sure it's answer are correct let alone the citations. They just look plausible. For anything little bit serious I use nouswise or nblm that sometimes abstain instead of making things up.

> the intent is good

What is that supposed to mean? They're trying to be an llm search engine that's not some radical new concept