Hacker News Reader

This is only natural; a great deal of the writing analyzed is by one of three authors at this point, in spite of the by-line. One of them is named Claude.

Look at the posts on this site. A massive portion of them are very obviously written by AI.

As AI gets better, I expect fewer people will do the toil of writing.

View on HN

> As AI gets better, I expect fewer people will do the toil of writing.

I do it just for the love of the game

> As AI gets better, I expect fewer people will do the toil of writing.

Sure, but you can replace `writing` with `thinking`, and it would still be correct. The question is whether this is a bad thing or a good thing.

>The question is whether this is a bad thing or a good thing.

Framing this as a debate worth having gives people who would argue on the side of "it's a good thing" a platform. We should not be giving people who would argue for the death of thinking a platform.

It's an inevitable thing unless you convince the industry to stop or all of humanity to boycott.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com