The model is probably excellent. The problem here is AGI having various definitions and many of them getting narrowed down to whatever makes benchmark numbers look good.
I guess there is fine tuning (and RAG) for those that need something bigger than just the knowledge contained in the context.
Opus/Sol are easily far smarter programmers than I, and this thing supposedly blows them out of the water. Once an LLM is a better doctor, researcher, biologist, chemist, mathematician, physicist than any human is that not AGI?
It didn't arrive in the form I would have ever imagined, but it's hard to say its not (imo).