Hacker News Reader

> It's not like any other device meets their ridiculous standards either

I don't think it's ridiculous to want the ability to relock the bootloader, for instance? Do you realise that if you cannot do that, you just break the whole Android security model right away?

> neither will their own Motorola whenever they get around to actually making it

Source: You made it up

A quick search would basically disprove everything after your first sentence.

It's a reasonable extrapolation of the current state. They want up to date patches, Google is already winding down open support for that, and it'll release in what, a year or two? Basically guaranteed to have outdated security patches on launch or they'll have to start maintaining their own. Might happen, but it seems unlikely they can hack it, as it were.

There are devices meeting these basic standards right now, and the entire family of them, no less.

GOS are vocal about safety and security of all the devices, not just seriously insecure Fairphones, and this article is about something different altogether, that's misinformation they've been hit with several times.

Fair criticism is fair, but yours is fabrications.