What's so special about the number 50? Why aren't you comparing to 40°C instead? 40°C is a more useful boundary than both 50°C and 100°F.
What's so special about the number 50? Why aren't you comparing to 40°C instead? 40°C is a more useful boundary than both 50°C and 100°F.
50˚C is the highest temperature that regularly occurs in the hottest place I can think of, Death Valley. The point is, half the 0-100 range never gets used even in extreme settings. But yeah, in most places, more than half is unused.
I still don't get why are you so fixated on 50°C. Why not 125°F? You'd get even more unused range if you go 0-125.
Also, I get some measures being pointlessly precise just cause it lines up with the units, but they deliberately add a decimal place to the displays to support ˚C, even in countries where ˚C is default. The same display could support 0.5˚F increments, but they intentionally don't.
> I still don't get why are you so fixated on 50°C. Why not 125°F? You'd get even more unused range if you go 0-125.
The 0-125˚F range gets used though. Usually 0-100 though. It's perfect.