I mean they did claim that pointing to science to support your position in an argument is tantamount to dogmatic faith, so I don’t think you need to worry about impugning what isn’t there
but ye, who I am to persecute people based on their beliefs, this is for religious people to do.
Science is peer reviewed by field experts who constantly test and develop said expertise in order to defeat their own biases, and their work backed by data. Scientists openly invite criticism and deconstruction of their work. That, nominally, is the whole point of getting your work published.
That’s a far cry from the dogmatic acceptance of faith that you’re pretending it is
This is what middle ages were famous for, and it took Renaissance to get rid of this.
edit: Giordano Bruno was burned at stake for challengin people like you.