Hacker News Reader

The readme was very clearly AI-written (or at least heavily AI-assisted)... not saying that's a bad thing, and I agree it's fairly well written... but it is very obviously AI

View on HN

k, I just looked through it for where the latest is. First of all, the earliest version were fully written by me, and then lightly edited with AI. The current state are as follows: intro sentences written by me, "why lightspeed" section too. Quickstart AI written, Features mostly written by me, but AI keeps interfering there. Design was also written by me several times, it also used to be much longer, but I just noticed AI put one a few paragraph of slop in there, I think that's the most egregious--shame on me for not caching it. So, if I look at the readme right now, I would say it's about 60% me. It can be better, I'll make the effort because it really bothers me if readmes are not (mostly) written by humans.

I really don't have a problem with you using AI, as long as you review and validate/test what it writes, and seems like you did that. Great project btw!

:-) https://github.com/smartcomputer-ai/lightspeed/pull/100

how so? which model? because it’s def not claudish.

the author commented otherwise.

The author literally said:

> There might be some AI-isms in there, because agents just can’t help themselves to dump their arcanae in there.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com