Phrasing it as something that happens over there is disingenuous when it resource extraction and foreign interference that directly contributed to political unrest and radicalization and war. It is the CIA that poured literal millions in funding extremists groups. It is western troops and bombs and that landed on their soil again and again.
It's not something that simply happens over there, war is not some unforgivable trait related to tanned foreign people who believe in islam. Our governments have their hand in this cookie jar.
The middle east is an outdated term referring to a conflict zone that the West itself created.
See why I’m not optimistic?
This, of course, is a statement that almost required the person who replied to you to add context due to the absurdity of the statement.
If you genuinely did not mean to imply this, you might consider reading your comments before submitting.
In fact, the aggressors in this case are European colonists, only 3rd generation or so, and they are pretty much following the standard historical playbook for how European colonists treat locals, including the assumed divine right of genocide ("manifest destiny") The Middle East isn't an especially belligerent place otherwise.
So I call your characterization unfair.