First, the subsidies to consumers for electric vehicles in Germany apply to all cars, not just those built in Europe. This effectively subsidizes the competition from China.
For subsidies to manufacturer, as I didn't quickly find any source making the direct comparison, I asked LLM to research it (I apologize for for this, but doing it manually would take too much time).
BYD: ~15% producer-focused economic benefit under the Commission's methodology; 17.0% including the legacy NEV fiscal scheme.
VW Europe: ~0.2–0.7% is my best public-data-based estimate of currently observable and allocatable producer support; roughly 0.7–1.3% if we deliberately make aggressive assumptions favorable to VW.
VW extreme stress test: ~2.5–3.2%, obtained by implausibly allocating essentially all VW Group grants and tax credits to European BEVs.
EU Commission's investigation calculated countervailable subsidy rates for Chinese BEVs: see "3.10.3. Calculation of subsidy rates" for a aggregate subsidy rates.https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=17382497...
Meanwhile, in the US, companies like Boeing, GM, and Intel will never be allowed to experience more than minor financial inconvenience before the government bails them out with protectionism, guaranteed loans, and outright subsidies.
I don't see a material difference between how the Chinese government treats their strategically-important industries and the way we do here in the West. Terms like "socialism," "Communism," and "capitalism" are just fodder for Fox News camp-followers.
Yes, but those are two separate things. Lower Saxony owning part of VW doesn’t mean VW gets extra public money because of it.
High subsidy rates alter market dynamics. Can we agree on that?
Subsidies to manufacturers in Germany are much smaller than both: subsidies to consumers in Germany, and subsidies to manufacturers in China.
So, there are different subsidy types with different subsidy rates which all impact the market. Higher rates usually have a higher impact, but type of subsidy can also change what kind of an impact they have. Any comparison quickly becomes complex.
I posted some numbers in an other post [0], but the numbers are not exact.
Subsidy is also one of many factors. Of course you also need capable people and manufacturing capabilities which China has. So, subsidy alone is not enough, but if needed capabilities exist, subsidy at high rates can help tip the scales.
It’s not happening and the imminent bust is coming. Strap in while the music gets turned up (dots, ipo etc) and people decide to leave the partayyy!