Hacker News Reader

Hmm well the depth buffer only has accurate depth for opaque objects (and even that's not really true). Things like hair wouldn't be in there. Its not ground truth depth.

View on HN

It is data, It doesn't have to be ground truth Depth. In fact the difference between what optically appears to be at one depth and the depth map depth is in-itself information. You have described a mechanism that the model can use to identify that what it is supposed to be enhancing is more likely to be hair.

I guess in this example since the model wasn’t trained on that, just like they said.

If that data is some kind of missing key, go make your own and stop nitpicking someone who made a great point as to why they didn’t want that oh so precious data

Reply on news.ycombinator.com