> You are also now contradicting your earlier stance somewhat...
Not even a little bit, no. Go back and read carefully. [0][1][2][3]
[0] <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49943382>
[1] <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49944036>
Not even a little bit, no. Go back and read carefully. [0][1][2][3]
[0] <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49943382>
[1] <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49944036>
A careful and honest reader notes that I've never claimed or suggested that there exists a software project that will never get better with enough time and appropriately-focused effort.
But, the single thing in this thread that statement by GK-H addresses is your claim [0] that
...nobody seems to be talking about any real [alternatives to using LLMs provided by the major LLM manufacturers]...