I am sympathetic. My understanding is limited to certain areas of biology but anecdotally, lab work sometimes just cannot be replicated for unknown reasons. Other fields such as academic psychology are dealing with what has been termed a "crisis of replicability" more or less across the board.
My take is that the main cause is poor methodology rather than outright falsification, but the outcome is the same: you can't trust a result until it has been confirmed in an independent study.
My brother in law only got one publication out of his PhD because his results were all negative, despite following a promising line of research. I'm glad to say that it wasn't a permanent setback -- he is now a full professor and edits a journal -- but it is a real testament to his ability and hard work that he could overcome that and succeed in a profession that is so demanding and competitive.