Identifying the origin let us see objects behind dust clouds or other obstacles.
How does this not violate conservation of momentum? Are you saying every single collision is head-on?
In other cases, the particle being collided is scattered and won't show up in the detector. Low energy neutrino collisions also have very faint light and difficult to detect. Solar system produced neutrinos are in this category.
- In the beginning, for the first couple of events, only because they have way higher energies than anything in the solar system could produce - By now, with enough data collected, their origin correlates very well with the milky way - we are close to identifying several far away galaxies as well
This is the significance. Contrary to some statements published today, IceCube was not primarily built to study Neutrinos, it was built to study the universe using Neutrinos.
That's why we care where they are coming from, we want to learn about the astrophysical objects that produce them.
- https://phys.org/news/2026-04-energetic-neutrino-primordial....
If my quick math is correct that is equivalent to dropping 3.59g one meter in a vacuum in earths gravity. insane that a subatomic particle can have that much energy.
This article has some ideas on such an energy:
https://phys.org/news/2025-05-physicists-route-neutrinos.htm...
It says "typically, energetic neutrinos from active galactic centers are thought to originate from interactions between protons and photons, producing gamma rays of comparable intensity." and suggests other theorized sources.
Another good source on this new branch of astronomy:
https://arxiv.org/html/1501.07798v1
Newer idea (May 2026): blazars
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/05/260523103912.h...
And sources have a maximum energy they can accelerate particles to.