> You know it's possible to READ too, right?
yes, and how do you prove that you both read and understand the code? saying you understand it does nothing especially when you no longer write the code.
> I have hundreds of repos at my job, some are in the 10s of thousands of lines of code, many are in the hundreds of thousands, and we still have a couple monoliths in the millions of lines of code range. Personal projects completely built with the LLM range in the 10s to 100s of thousands of lines.
Who cares because how would you be able to prove that? I can say the same thing.
> It's sustainable. LLMs have no problem working on all these projects and working on them across repos.
You have no proof of that especiall at scale. If anything all you're telling me, especially with your hard to believe anecdotes, is that you're not very experienced and you're very imaginative. It's also hard to believe anything that you've written because it makes no sense unless everyone above you isn't technical because what you're doing wouldn't fly anywhere that wasn't just a really small shop in the middle of nowhere with one or two apps.
> You haven't disproven shit using research papers using Claude 2
Compared to your anecdotes, those white papers are real work by credible professionals at respected institutions with real data that says definitively that YOU ARE WRONG. If you feel that they are wrong, feel free to prove it with specific examples and data. Right, you won't because of reasons...
I'm done humoring you. This was a complete waste of time.