Why not? Many 20th-century geopolitical basket cases have the fingerprints of empire on them.
According to Claude:
Significant responsibility
• 1914, Nigeria: Britain merged two protectorates but governed them separately → the Biafran War (1967–70).
• 1915–22, Iraq/Middle East: Britain made contradictory promises and drew borders with France → coups, the 1958 revolution, the 1990 invasion of Kuwait.
• 1917–48, Palestine: Britain made irreconcilable pledges and left without a settlement → the Arab–Israeli conflict.
• 1920–21, Ireland: Partition was drawn to give unionists a built-in majority → the Civil War and the Troubles.
• 1930–56, Sudan: Britain sealed off the south, then rejoined it to the north at independence → two civil wars and South Sudan's secession.
• 1947, India/Pakistan: A rushed exit and hastily drawn borders → partition violence, the Kashmir dispute, and Pakistan's 1971 breakup.
Partial responsibility
• 1935–48, Burma: Britain ruled the hill peoples separately → decades of insurgency, though the Japanese occupation and military rule matter as much.
• 1953, Iran: Britain co-led the coup with the CIA → the Shah's autocracy and the 1979 revolution, with the US sharing the lead.
• 1954–63, Somalia: Britain handed Somali-inhabited lands to Ethiopia and Kenya → border wars, though Italy, the Cold War and the dictatorship weigh more.
• 1960, Cyprus: Divide-and-rule tactics and an unworkable constitution → the 1974 division, with Greece and Turkey as central actors.
• 1965–79, Zimbabwe: Britain didn't confront the Rhodesian breakaway and deferred land reform → the later collapse, which was mostly the ruling party's doing.
• Also arguable: Sri Lanka, Fiji, Aden/South Yemen, and the Durand and McMahon border lines.