How do you think a PhD committee should referee a dissertation where all the ideas came from AI?
I gave an LLM recently a job of analysing past sessions to estimate how much time it would take a human to do the jobs requested.
Ingesting 600k word document and drawing conclusions/patterns from it is something I routinely give to Terra. It would take a human 33h non stop to read it. But finding patterns with good precision - personally I wouldn’t be able to.