Obviously your biggest customers would be in active warzones, or areas worried about soon becoming warzones.
Drone attacks on US soil are (hopefully!) not happening anytime soon.
Drone attacks on US soil are (hopefully!) not happening anytime soon.
The continental USA has not yet been threatened by drones.
The USA is, however, the sovereign power controlling the smouldering ruins of military bases in Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait, and the recently evacuated airfield in England. Some might say those constitute US soil.
Ukraine is left to fend for itself. The Taliban runs Afghanistan. Iraq is still in bits. A new ceasefire with Iran is announced every other week.
No, the current policy is to shout loudly and carry a small stick.
Lots of "surgical" airstrikes, each lasting one media cycle and accompanied by a truckload of bluster and spin.
The current occupant of the White House appears to think foreign wars are principally a communications problem.
So...the west if we go by the recent statements of chancellor Merz
This would be incredibly stupid. An attack on American soil could be met with a literally nuclear response against Iran or whoever perpetrated it.
(We did nominally succeed in regime change in the country that didn't attack us, though...)
It wasn't Afghanistan (as a nation) that directly carried out 9/11. The government did have close ties with Al Qaeda and sheltered it though.
> An attack on American soil could be met with a literally nuclear response against Iran or whoever perpetrated it.
Al Qaeda is in the "whoever" category that you claimed would be met with a nuclear response.
America a super power ran away from the Houthis... who only have toyotas, no army, no navy and no airforce.
Prediction markets are betting on a false flag attack around midterms.