Some US states seem to spend more per pupil than excellent independent ("private") schools in the UK. That is a lot of money.
teacher pay-rate and total comp are better indicators of defunding and they are dismal: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_211.60.a... - this shows pay rates have stagnated since the late 2000s with some trending downwards since
even then the rising costs don't reflect an increase in percent-of-GDP spending - that's actually gone down in the past decade: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/tables/dt22_106.10.a...
> the per-pupil number is a deliberate red herring. spending increases only cover increasingly expensive private contracts, expensive middle-managers who often contribute little of value in terms of actually educating pupils, and liabilities
Is that not just a more detailed explanation of what the comment said? jayglow said
> you can argue that the funds aren't well allocated
You have explained how they have been badly allocated. Its a general pattern in the western world's government expenditure on many things.