AI is innovative but cannot string together true confident sentences.
AI is so innovative that nothing innovative or groundbreaking has so far appeared. Maybe it will, but the claims to ground-truth ratio is off the charts.
World ending is so funny it is usually only parroted and swallowed by gullible people.
> it can do the work of a PhD on almost every field of human knowledge
This is the most revealing and the most hilarious one. This is essentially the argument from authority wrapped in a PR stunt. Those who produce real innovations overwhelmingly does it outside curriculum and as part of the real work they are engaged in with very few historical exceptions. That statement reveals a lack of understanding of what innovation itself means let alone the virtue signalling they are trying to sell.
> machine specific math proofs
This one was initially intriguing, but as I earlier said, is a well defined and constrained bounded domain. The accusation that hours earlier other human researchers's work may have been used to plagiarize the proof has muddied the waters further.