> Well, you can contrast with LBJ, who by all accounts was a total asshole, apparently even exposing his penis to colleagues and on one occasion to reporters. But the media focused on more substantial problems, particularly Vietnam, and pressure eventually led him to abandon his second electoral run.
The penis exposure I would have imagined would have worked quite well in the 60s.
Generally the media likes to take credit for things after the fact. If people's sons were coming back in body bags in some foreign war that isn't going to be popular. I remember when the reality of the Iraq war started affected people here. People were unhappy about the Iraq war when people they knew started coming back to the UK in coffins.
The problem often with a lot of modern media is that because it is often partisan they will often ignore their own side's wrong doings. So the only thing they often can go after without exposing their own side wrong doings is the crass stuff and other surface level shite that isn't important.
Generally the media is shit anyway (and I guarantee it was crap then). One of the BBC reports I saw recently were "The Conservatives disagree with Labour on X", as if they were ever going to say the other people were doing the correct thing. Why even bother reporting it? What is the value? There is none.
> What you have perhaps overlooked is that many average people are also fairly crass, and they see these traits as “relatable”. In current US culture, and perhaps Brazil as well, decorum is only important to a narrow slice of society.
Decorum/Etiquette is dependant on the company you typically keep. Usually different between different social castes (working, middle, upper, elite). What is and isn't acceptable is different depending on who you are around, their age group etc.