The Fourth Amendment to the constitution disagrees. Blanket surveillance by definition flies in the face of our right against unreasonable search.
> “shooting somebody in the face with a gun”
If you try to visualize this in action, replace somebody with a bad guy. And you quickly see there’s nothing inherently wrong with the idea.
> If you try to visualize this in action, replace economic migrants from Latin America with spies from China. And you quickly see there’s nothing inherently wrong with the idea.
Is this a joke?
Now replace "spies from China" with "your husband/wife", and you will see, that yes, there is something inherently wrong with the idea
"Nightmare" program is right. When the wifey asks where I was last night and can check my story with the ICE app.
Yeah what’s disingenuous about the “spies from China” is that if they are already identified as spies they would be under targeted surveillance already.