Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by charlesfries | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

charlesfries

What is the practical use case of this? https://x.com/JehovaTrades/status/2110906028971938252

View on HN

Literally dozens of scenarios have been documented. e.g. https://youtube.com/watch?v=f1B21Nd9oZ4&t=1000s

Nice ;)

Americans will do anything to avoid roundabouts.

Neat, but that car has to be practically empty. It appears to have very low inertia.

By rough estimate, using hydroxide jet packs as a reference, I’d say they got it down to about 600kg.

That would be impressive.

Only if you believe this to be representative of a road legal car. I find it easier to believe that it's a purpose-built stunt prototype, otherwise they couldn't stop talking about how clever they were solving the seemingly infinite list of engineering challenges and contradictions that make it an actual car that actual people can drive on an actual road.

? Do you think a Lambo is a particularly practical car? Obviously it’s a stunt car. It’s doing stunts! And no, it’s not legal to drive around shooting huge supersonic jets around the car; that’s hardly a criticism.

You were never stuck in traffic I take it:D Insurance will be a bitch, but people will move out of your way.

FWIW if you’re that concerned about scaring other people out of your way you could just wave a gun around out the driver’s side window. You’d spend less money and get your desired effect.

Why would you suggest something so unnecessarily violent?

Cars kill just as many people as guns

Some of us don't live in countries where this is acceptable.

You're forgetting that other drivers very well may be armed with an even bigger gun.

WTF, that the most cartoonist thing i've seen today. Does it really have to do the flip ?

yes

To show off? Like whatever you think of it the market for supercars is rich men who want to show off so Tesla is playing in that market.

Sexist much? https://www.instagram.com/supercarblondie

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule

What is the practical use case of having a bunch of high powered jets all around the car? It could be used to automatically avoid fatal accidents, or at least reduce risk and damage in an accident situation. I thought everybody who watched the presentation video would reach that conclusion.

You are correct in that almost nobody commenting here watched the presentation.

If the car doesn't cause fatal accidents in the first place.

you know what happens to you if a jet engine moves your car out of the way? you have the accident inside your car by yourself, you become the accident. physics states that all forces will be equal.

> It could be used to automatically avoid fatal accidents

I find it genuinely hilarious that anyone could possibly think this is a good idea.

> It could be used to automatically avoid fatal accidents…

Or make a few! https://www.space.com/space-exploration/launches-spacecraft/...

> SpaceX thinks it knows why its newest Starship spacecraft went boom this week. "Initial analysis indicates the potential failure of a pressurized tank known as a COPV, or composite overwrapped pressure vessel, containing gaseous nitrogen in Starship's nosecone area, but the full data review is ongoing," the company wrote in an update on Thursday (June 19).

I look forward to phantom braking changing to phantom launching your ass into the ceiling of an underpass

By propelling you onto the sidewalk and crushing whatever poor pedestrian happened to be there?

To play Spy Hunter irl?

Uhh to be sick af?

To brag to other, lesser billionaires.

Flexing on the poors

Reply on news.ycombinator.com