Ah yeah, the good old "you don't check compiler output" argument.

LLM output isn't compiler output. It's a lot of shitty code that contains duplication, subpar algorithms, bad data access patterns etc. We were complaining about awful software before LLMs. Why is it now absolutely okay to write shitty software just because it's LLMs?

Also: literally no one is talking about "writing software as art". We 're talking about this: "many things (redundant code, duplicate code, overly complex architecture, etc.)"