Or it's 4 paragraphs in to the article:
>He’d slept in the home of the man who claims to be the new head of the Oath Keepers, rifling through his files in the middle of the night.
>He’d slept in the home of the man who claims to be the new head of the Oath Keepers, rifling through his files in the middle of the night.
2. Same with the GP calling for "public hearings before the Senate" about it - I don't understand why they'd call for it for a militia leader (as a militia leader insecurely storing their files isn't a crime) unless they were actually calling for public hearings before the Senate digging into Trump illegally taking/insecurely storing classified documents?