This title is 100% false. It is not possible for a private company to "violate the 4th amendment". The Bill of Rights constrains the government, not private parties.
Marsh v. Alabama: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama
Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burton_v._Wilmington_Parking_A...
Flock is often contracted to install and operate its camera network on behalf of local governments and police. The specific act that violated the 4th Amendment in this case was the government searching the collected data, but it is within the realm of possibility that Flock’s existing business model will be considered an unconstitutional dragnet.
I agree it is in the realm of possibility. It's just not the thing that has happened here.