Citing classic great replacement theory rhetoric on the 'data of a disappearing people' is not compelling. Miscegenation is very human that happens in every society. Ethnicity and culture is mutable and always will be. People move and intermingle. That is human. Trying to artificially isolate a group of people with a particular set of genes is unnatural, gross, and eventually leads to genetic stagnation.

Your whataboutisms are weak. Other dominant ethnic groups can be supremacist. Backwards logic is not limited to white peoples.

Are you willing to enact great suffering and violence upon many people just to maintain your artificial idea of what it means to be a certain nationality, frozen in some arbitrary time? Because, historically, that’s what we’ve seen it takes. Segregation. Camps. Apartheid.

> Linking to that Wikipedia article doesn’t change the fact that the data obviously show Europeans will become a minority in almost all of their homeland countries within the next 50 years. It’s irrefutable.

Where do my quarter-Mexican, quarter-Italian, quarter-Croatian children fall in that census? Are they white? Are they a minority, or not? Does it matter how Mestizo their grandmother was? What if she was indigenous?

Hopefully the next generation ignores retards that hold on to ideas of ethnicity like they’re some sacred line in the fight between good and evil and just fucks like all their ancestors did and life moves on.

> it’s a very human desire that every nation shares

Nations are a very recent construct in the history of the world. Your appeal to nature is audaciously ignorant.