The implication being that you're writing in a language so unsafe that you need to pay for AI data centers to periodically double-check it for you. That isn't the argument in favor of C that you think it is.
Oh, do you think Rust code bases won't be checked using LLMs?
I hope this is satire.
I've never seen a proof that LLMs can fix memory safety in C or C++ like Rust does. I'll believe it when I'll see it.
And I prefer to work with Rust than both anyway. Such advancement (if it will happen) will only make other languages like Zig feasible for me.
or to save tokens you can have an LLM write a borrow checker to do this for you. Oh wait you're just rebuilding rust...
The point of writing in C is that I don't have to deal with borrow checker shit when it is too dumb to figure out what I want to do is actually safe.