It's certainly possible, and even likely, that AI companies will fail to deliver, but let's assume for a moment that they don't crash and burn.
Why bother learning drawing at all, if an AI can draw better than you? Presumably because you, yourself, want to draw.
AI art currently mostly sucks, but if we solve that, there's an infinite supply of art that will be more to your friends taste than anything you want produce.
And as to Wolfram alpha: people here, on this site, argue that mental math is unnecessary because of calculators.
I draw myself. AI draws way better than me and will continue to draw way better than I do. I still go to live figure drawing sessions every other week and show people my work and they show me theirs and share criticism. I don't show my work to friends, it's mostly just to other artists.
These people, like you, are not the sharpest tools in the shed.
As long as there's an element of competition, you need to take advantage and remove the human from the loop if they're the bottleneck.
Add to that the tendency of people to take the solution that's easy in the moment, and not the long term best option, and yes, I think a lot of people will outsource their thinking.
As for what makes life worth living? Enriching the wealthy, if you look at the actions if the tech industry. The world we're heading to seems like a hell.
> Add to that the tendency of people to take the solution that's easy in the moment, and not the long term best option, and yes, I think a lot of people will outsource their thinking.
Hmm I don't agree with this, many people will want to live instead of longevitymaxxing like Bryan Johnson.
> The world we're heading to seems like a hell.
We agree.
A good education would let you realise how unlikely this is.