> Instead they seem to think that AI can someone work around what is essentially laws of nature.
I am not. I am just assuming that whatever approximation humans can build, a robot could do better.
I am not. I am just assuming that whatever approximation humans can build, a robot could do better.
(note that your comment uses present tense)
Saying that a robot could get closer to the limit than a human is not saying the limit doesn't exist?
I'm not heavy pro-ai but I don't see how its a contradiction.