they have contact info. look at the first post [0] on the blog, it has their email, zkldi@proton.me
the user "zkldi" is who submitted it to hn also. seems like a real person to me.
the user "zkldi" is who submitted it to hn also. seems like a real person to me.
https://www.twitch.tv/zkldi/about
https://github.com/zkldi?page=2&tab=repositories
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/User_talk:Zkldi
edit: unless there is AI that fakes being human since 2021 and has its own Twitch channel in order to post a blog post to Hacker News.
> I'm a 21 year old programmer from the UK. In my free time, I play ITG and create rhythm game adjacent stuff.
Is this a good source for "actually, the people are wrong and you shouldn't worry. This is overblown"?
Should that be guiding people's decisions on how to treat this very real and confirmed by the devs and third parties vulnerability?
But again this is very very simple to refute by actually linking a working PoC.
The statement was that it's not a real (primarily as in credible, relevant. Actually real also an aspect but not the primary one) person.
There could technically be a human behind it, just like Jia Tan could've been a human. But for judging the input, that is irrelevant and misleading.
The biggest problem reality is facing is that people's consensus operates on "having every voice heard", which is good in a small village, but terrible in a globalized internet.
And thus, if we want to keep "every voice needs to be heard", we need to reclassify "voice" and "real" not just on "has cells".
That's the mental shorthand I operate on, which I should have resolved down fully to make it work with "normal" people's brains. Regrettably.
Or rather, maybe we do, but we might differ when it comes to topics where claims as big as these are made.