People seem to forget that LLMs copied human writing. They also tended to copy people with more proper or formally trained writing styles. There are so many journalists and writers that talk about how they've had to 'stupify' how they write so they don't get accused of being an LLM.
It's like we're running idiocracy on fast forward.
And if McDonalds started mass-producing the restaurant's signature burger, I would hope the chef has enough pride/business sense to make a new signature burger.
Remember how pre-AI everyone used to complain about hating how this or that website hijacked scrolling? Countless words were written about hijacked scrollbars and back buttons. Zero conversations were improved by the comments and zero websites were changed as a result. It was just complaining.
"Boo hoo AI" is the same kind of low-effort, complain about everything while adding nothing to the conversation post.
Instead, try to say something more substantive than "I found a word or phrase that I think was AI."
It's just ironic to me how so many people are confidently incorrect about it, we are the LLMs in this case spouting 'facts' that we are sure of.
> It's just as tiring as LLM written articles.
It's not even as tiring as reading one unedited LLM article.
I wish we got more such replies like that to articles. This is a confusing times, and social interaction helps in several ways.
> People seem to forget that LLMs copied human writing.
This is literally not true, but more importantly the conclusion you trying to use it for is blatantly false.