But Krugman doesn’t “just study stuff.” That’s the misrepresentation. You’re not performing skepticism; it’s either ignorance or petty dishonesty.
And all the Krugman negging! “Not a real Nobel Prize.” Sick burn, dude.
And all the Krugman negging! “Not a real Nobel Prize.” Sick burn, dude.
Krugman makes me think of Ashraf Ghani, the former President of Afghanistan and academic. The guy literally wrote a book “Fixing Failed States.” Then he got the chance to put his theory to practice and he flamed out miserably. Then there’s Muhammad Yunus, another Nobel Prize winning economist who is currently shitting the bed as prime minister of Bangladesh. I’d love to see Krugman put his money where his mouth is and run even a small economy.
I gave you the benefit of doubt earlier, but you can’t get through a comment without dropping a snarky jab.
Not liking people is normal. I don’t see why you thought you had to attempt to conceal your contempt (or that you could, since it’s apparently so strong).
I’m glad you finally admitted to some of your feelings on the matter. A limited hangout, as they say.
> I don’t think someone who just thinks about stuff should have the power to “take Starlink away” from someone who does stuff.
Even if you insist Krugman “just thinks about stuff,” he objectively does not have the power you ascribe to him.