In general I take your point, but in an attempt to steelman OP:

Perhaps they're using "surrender" in its meaning of "hand over something you didn't want to hand over", "give up under duress"?

So they're a piece of shit because you've decided that surrendering necessarily means losing physical possession

I agree with the wording, having to give your ID to Google when we'd all much rather that they don't have it is a surrender, it's dubious consent (read: not consent) it's precisely as vile and forceful as the word surrender implies it is

you're drawing a line between "showing" vs "surrendering" by physical possession. Well, there's a big difference between showing an ID at a bank and providing a copy to Google which they keep forever.

the business world is moving to be an authority. It's perfectly valid unless you stick to the idea that government some how is regulating businesses.