How is the article going to clarify the opinion of another commenter? The whole section (that I've read) on the random numbers only mentions two trials, and I questioned what the commenter made out of that. (I don't think the random number part matters in the overall complaint of the other points.)

---

For comparison:

I clicked twice to generate numbers on random.org

The second generated numbers were

    Here are your random numbers:

    13     22 

    Timestamp: 2026-10-27 10:01:22 UTC

Should I send random.org an inquiry

> why would ~~AI~~ random.org pick two numbers, out of 1 to 25? Should that not be evenly distributed instead? Why is the AI so skewed?

(The first set of numbers were 20 and 12. Unfortunately I didn't get lucky to get 13/22 on the first try.)