https://ij.org/press-release/homeowners-appeal-to-u-s-suprem...
The victims weren't even accused of a crime, let alone convicted, and the police destroyed their house without compensation. They lost in court, because of the important American principle that the police can do what they like and owe nothing to the citizenry.
_If_ this is an accurate summary of the ruling, that definitely doesn't agree with -say- the Third Amendment.
Do you happen to know whether the Supreme Court declined to hear the case?
That reminds me of the time -IIRC- Scalia asserted that it was A-OK for the cops to "happen" to kill a fleeing suspect by dropping a tree on his moving car, even if they expected that the falling tree would strike the car.
If I'm attributing the decision to the right guy, I'm sure he would have loved to have gotten a chance to exonerate all those ICE agents who've -collectively- gone on a murder spree here "recently".