Hacker News Reader

You can’t prove your inverse take tho.

Reading comprehension is important. There was no inverse take here. Just pointing out anecdotal evidence isn't enough to draw a conclusion over a larger sample size.

Mmm nope, that trick doesn't work here today.

You want them to cite sources for something they can't possibly cite. I'm telling you that you are doing the same thing they are: confidently asserting that you're correct even though you cannot possibly prove that.

It is not a difficult concept.

> confidently asserting that you're correct

Where did you see this? The acoustics in your head must be wild:))

> The acoustics in your head must be wild

Source?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com