Everyone claims to be interested in the truth. Ideologically driven political agitators are not particularly credible on that point though.
Elon Musk has likely done irreparable harm to my country. Harm that undoes generations of progress and sacrifice by people I've loved dearly.
I do wish that more people cared and it's supremely disappointing to me that they don't.
Grok had specific baked in instructions to avoid negative statements about Musk and Trump, how is that for truth seeking? No other LLM company has done that from what I know.
I know Musk tried to subvert it before, but it doesn't seem to have worked much, or at least not much these days.
Yes, it's also easy to use real facts and get Gemini to criticise Google, GPT models to criticise OpenAI, and Claude models to criticise Anthropic.
But the point is that people think Grok is somehow super loyal to Musk, and it's simply not. Maybe it's because it's "maximum truth-seeking", I have no idea.
DeepSeek’s Winnie-the-Pooh Problem (Feb 2025) - https://medium.com/humanai/deepseeks-winnie-the-pooh-problem...
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/elon-m...
https://www.theregister.com/offbeat/2022/11/14/twitter-engin...
If you simply go by what he is saying, then you should also simply go by what anyone else is saying during the time Musk isn't talking. When he says he's Jesus, he's Jesus until someone else says he's not. That's as much as you can be trusted with.
Right, fair enough since Musk and the sort of people he supports and associates with are widely know for not being the biggest liars and hypocrites in generations.