I feel like it's once a week that HN surfaces some incredibly overhyped, low-on-the-hierarchy-of-evidence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_of_evidence) study specifically related to anti-aging.

I wish there was some nuanced line for science journalists to not hyperbolize about nothingburger studies in dire need of replication while also making the science exciting, slow of a process as it is. Maybe every article includes a history of the that very specific and narrow sub-branch of the field? That would be really interesting to read, and to have a gauge on how far we've come.