[flagged]
if your readme is meant to only ever be read by 'agents' then fine. if you want actual humans to read it, write in a human language, not LLM-speak.
it literally could not be more simple.
It's written in english. And probably written better than the average human would do.
If you don't like it, explain why. Otherwise you all just sound like divas.
LLM docs suck and I’d rather have no docs if a human is too lazy to write them well, at least I can tell my LLM to look at the code.
Sure, but you're not going to waste your time (and money) having an LLM look through random piles of source code. That's kindof the point of these generated READMEs that you hate so much: to give you an idea of if you want to investigate it more deeply.
If it bothers you so much, just ignore the README. But this "how dare they present this garbage to me!" is an entitled and hypocritical rant that's being repeated over and over and it needs to stop.
It's explained all over this thread, but you've ignored this for some reason.
I’m not fighting any particular fight, I’m just saying that the lack of care stands out to me, and evidently to others, and that anyone releasing a new project might want to consider whether they want it to be perceived in that way.
You don't know how much they cared. You also don't know if they reviewed the README before publishing, or if was a mindless one-shotted PR that nobody looked at. The word "gate" isn't a smoking gun here, other than to prove that the reader uses AI a ton and is ironically now triggered by it. If your criticism was more substantial: targeting the content rather than the use of a trigger word, then I might agree. But you haven't done anything but project your own bias.